Author Archives: Sharma-Crawford

Updates to the Syed Ahmed Jamal Immigration Case

2/19/18 – 3pm
We hope ICE watches this video. No crimes, no violations of supervision, a father, a husband, a loved member of his community, the sole breadwinner with valid work authorization, a job to go back to and a stay in place. Keeping him in custody simply because they can.

2/18/18 – 3:45pm

We headed up for Syed's family to visit him, at the scheduled time today. Even though we called three times prior to…

Posted by Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law on Sunday, February 18, 2018

2/16/18 – 11:45am
Syed Jamal continues to be detained at taxpayer expense despite having valid work authorization, a job and being the sole bread winner. The family is attempting to visit him on Sunday.

Meanwhile, Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins visited with Syed’s wife and three children about the private bill she introduced Tuesday, seeking to aid Syed in his legal fight to avoid deportation.

The bill would make Syed Jamal and his wife, Angela Zaynub Chowdhury, eligible to receive an immigrant visa or to adjust their status to permanent residency upon filing an application.

Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins and the Family of Syed Jamal

2/15/18 – 9am
Thank you Dan Margolies from KCUR for your work to accurately timeline of the effort that Syed Jamal has made over the course of 30 years to remain legally documented and on a path to citizenship. Another example it’s not as simple as “why hasn’t he become a citizen,” and exhibiting “what has he done to try?”
Read the Article

2/14/18 – 7pm
Video of the press conference held earlier today outside the Platte County Jail, where Syed Jamal arrived at 2:30 and is being detained.

2/14/18 – 3:15pm
We have confirmed that Syed Jamal is back in KC, and being detained at the Platte County Jail. We will have a press conference outside the Platte County Jail at 5pm CST. 415 S 3 St, Platte City, MO 64079

2/14/18 – Noon
U.S. Rep. Lynn Jenkins has introduced a private bill seeking to aid Syed Jamal in his legal fight to avoid deportation.

The bill, which the Republican congresswoman introduced Tuesday in the U.S. House of Representatives, would make Jamal and his wife, Angela Zaynub Chowdhury, eligible to receive an immigrant visa or to adjust their status to permanent residency upon filing an application.

2/14/18 – 11am
CONFIRMED: Syed Jamal will be back in Kansas City this afternoon. He is coming home.

2/14/18 – 10am
Angie Ricono, an investigative reporter with KCTV5 News in Kansas City, addresses the complexities some immigrants face in the process of trying to legally become an American citizen. It’s not the same path for everyone, and it’s not as simple as “why didn’t they just become a citizen.”

Brian Johnson with KMBC also put together a piece addressing the same question, focusing on the difference for those who enter the US as students or workers under non-immigrant visas versus those that come in under immigrant visas.

Why Didn't Syed Jamal Apply for Citizenship?

Have you asked this question? 'After 30 years, why didn't Syed Jamal just apply to become a U.S. Citizen the legal way?' If you've asked the question, watch this video then share our report.So many of our viewers are asking it, so KMBC 9 got answers. We've complied all the facts from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, The State Department and Jamal's attorney to explain. Syed Jamal is a scientist and adjunct college professor at Park University who immigrated to the U.S. in 1987 from Bangladesh. He overstayed his visas three times. ICE arrested him on January 24th. Now he's in a jail in El Paso, Texas while an immigration judge hears from Jamal's attorney and attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security.The group Free Syed Ahmed Jamal has raised $42,000 through GoFundMe. They have gathered 77,000 signatures using They have sent hundreds of notarized letters to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and gathered support from members of Congress including Representatives Jenkins, Cleaver, Yoder and Senator McCaskill.Jamal's fate is now in the hands of Judge Glen R. Baker.Read more about our coverage of Syed Jamal at the following links.

Posted by Brian Johnson KMBC on Saturday, February 10, 2018

We sincerely appreciate these reporters and their stations for trying to not just report the news on the latest developments in these people’s stories, but also trying to help us educate the public on how truly complex, and unique each story can be.

2/14/18 – 9:15am
While our focus over the last week has been on Syed Jamal, it’s important for everyone to realize that there are many all over this country, facing our dysfunctional immigration system. This is the story of Carlos Alberto Bringas-Rodriguez, another one of our clients, also having gone through great struggles and confusion while trying to remain in our country legally.

2/13/18 – 6:10pm
We have two updates to share:

At 4:56pm today, a Motion to Change Venue was filed in the federal habeas case asking the Court to either send the federal habeas case to Hawaii or Order DHS to return Syed to Missouri so the court here can continue to hear the case. This was done because when a person is no longer in the jurisdiction, the federal court is at risk of losing jurisdiction over the case. Attorneys for the government have indicated they are coordinating efforts to bring Syed back to Kansas City, however the exact timing of that remains unclear. It is the hope of many that his return to Kansas City will be very soon.

The other development is that Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins, today introduced legislation known as a “private bill” to grant Syed and his wife lawful permanent status. While that process is time consuming, it is indeed an extraordinary event. Lawmakers from both sides of the state line continue to coordinate efforts and have shown eminence in leadership to support and protect this family.

2/13/18 – 3:45pm
Today has been quite the opposite kind of day from yesterday. Not much new development today. Syed is still in the Honolulu Federal Detention Center, and we are awaiting an update from his case worker on what the decision is with the new stay in place if he will be moved or not, and if so where. We’ll update you as soon as we have any news.

2/12/18 – 6:00pm
This is the video from this afternoon’s press conference. We know the plane he is on will stop in Honolulu to refuel. Due to the fact that is still US soil, because of the stay granted by the Board of Immigration Appeals, Syed Jamal will be pulled off the plane there. We will provide updates on where his next destination is once we get that information, which may not be until tomorrow.

Immigration attorney for Syed Jamal speaking about today’s update on deportation

Posted by William Joy – TV on Monday, February 12, 2018

2/12/18 – 4:30pm
The Board of Immigration Appeals has responded to our appeal and a motion for a stay of removal, it has been granted.

A report we received on Syed’s whereabouts is that he is on his way to Hawaii.

2/12/18 – 2:45pm
Outrageous! What we know is that Syed was taken from the West Texas Detention Facility at 5:51 AM (6:51am CST) by El Paso ICE ERO. At 11:45am CST we received the decision of the Immigration Court denying his motions and dissolving the stay. At 1:00 PM CST, we transmitted an appeal and a motion for stay of removal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. By 1:26pm CST the motion and the stay were docketed by the Board. As of this update, the ICE locator still lists Syed at the West Texas Detention Center even though we have reason to believe he is not there.

We have not formally or informally been notified as to where exactly Syed is currently located. We don’t know when ICE received the decision of the Court. And we do not know how such swift action by ICE could have occurred if all parties had been notified at the same time.

An attack on the system is an attack on due process.

2/12/18 – 1:30pm
At approximately 11:45 am CST we received word that Judge Baker denied the Motions pending before him and dissolved the Stay of removal previously issued.

At approximately 1:00 pm CST An appeal notice along with a fresh motion for stay was forwarded to the Board of Immigration Appeals in Falls Church Virginia.

We have been diligently using every resource we have to confirm Mr. Jamal’s whereabouts. We have learned, not as a result of ICE informing us, that he was taken to a plane at 5:50am this morning.

We will provide updates if and as we get more information.

2/11/18 – 11:30am
There is a local KC event this afternoon in support of Mr. Jamal and others. It is being hosted by the  KC Metro Immigration Alliance – KC MÍA. It is confirmed that Congressman Cleaver is confirmed to speak at the event.
When: 3pm CST
Where: All Souls Unitarian Universalist Church Kansas City, Missouri
Event Facebook Post

2/11/18 – 2am
We visited Syed Ahmed Jamal at the West Texas Detention Facility this evening. We were accompanied by Congressman Emmanuel Cleaver II. We went to ensure our client understood what was happening in his case and make sure he was being treated well.

Congressman Cleaver went to meet the college professor, who had never committed a crime, but who was taken into custody by ICE from his front lawn and in front of his child. The Congressman went to meet the man who was so beloved by his community and his family that they were fiercely rallying for his release. He also went to give support to a man in detention nearly 950 miles from the only place he considers home.

As they spoke Syed asked the Congressman how the Congressman’s wife was doing. And in that moment we all learned why so many people are vociferously supporting Syed. Because even in the face of such distress, Syed took a moment to focus not on his own predicament, but instead to ask this Congressman, who had traveled so far to provide comfort, how his wife was doing. Humility and grace in the face of adversity.

2/10/18 – 5:30pm
Congressman and Methodist minister, Emanuel Cleaver, and Michael Sharma-Crawford are en route to El Paso, Texas to visit Mr. Jamal. Watch our Facebook Page for posts once they arrive.
Representative Cleaver on a plane on the way to El Paso, Texas to visit Mr. Jamal.

2/9/18 – 4pm
At Noon today, DHS filed their Opposition to Syed Ahmed Jamal’s Motion to Rescind and Reopen his deportation case. The Opposition was based upon their belief that the deportation order was valid and that Mr. Jamal’s safety would not be at risk if he is returned to Bangladesh.

Once the DHS opposition is filed, it was imperative that we file our Response immediately, to ensure the Court would have all relevant information and arguments in order to make a decision on the filings. At 3:45pm today, the Response was filed.

At this point, the record is now considered closed and will be reviewed by Judge Baker, the immigration judge who granted the temporary stay on February 7th, and he will provide a ruling on the pending motions. The ruling will determine whether Mr. Jamal’s case can be re-opened in court and whether he should be deported or not. It is unknown how long the Court will take to review the matter, however, it is likely that a decision will come in the coming days.

The government also filed a motion to dismiss our filling on the federal habeas petition. That dismissal seems to indicate that since Judge Baker had granted a temporary stay, the federal court should allow the process to proceed only in front of him. While there are greater issues than simply the stay that are before the federal court, the Dismissal motion is being reviewed and a response will be timely filed in that matter. At this time, a Response has not been ordered by the Court but normal schedules allow for a Response to be filed on or before February 23, 2018.

2/9/18 – 12:30pm
We received word that DHS has filed the opposition to our filing. We’ll provide more information shortly.

2/8/18 – 5:30pm
Video of the call Syed Ahmed Jamal’s family received from Representative Cleaver this afternoon.

2/8/18 – 4:15pm

  • Syed Ahmed Jamal was was transported to the West Texas Detention Facility in Sierra Blanca, TX, where he will remain until Monday, February 12.
  • We have received a letter from Representative Emanuel Cleaver, II to President Trump regarding Mr. Jamal’s case.
    A letter from Representative Emanuel Cleaver, II to President Trump regarding Syed Ahmed Jamal's case.
  • Mr. Jamal’s family also received a call from Representative Cleaver this afternoon to assure them he is doing everything he can to help reunite them.Syed Ahmed Jamal's family talking to Representative Cleaver on the phone

2/8/18 – 11am
Rekha Sharma-Crawford and some of Syed Ahmed Jamal’s family members will answer all media questions at 1:30 CST today at a press conference at the Sharma-Crawford, Attorneys at Law Office, located at 515 Avenida Cesar E Chavez, Kansas City, MO 64108. Map

2/8/18 – 10am

  • An immigration judge has granted a stay for Mr. Jamal.
  • He is now in the custody of ICE officers.
  • At this time, he will not be deported, but the stay is temporary.

2/8/18 – 1am

  • We learned that Syed Ahmed Jamal was moved closer to the airport.
  • We filed in federal district court on a habeas petition.
  • We are asking the court to release him since he was taken into custody illegally.
  • The lawsuit is filed in the Western District of Missouri.

2/7/18: Press Release
Kansas Chemistry Professor and Community Leader Turns to the Immigration Courts

Kansas City, MO (February 7, 2018) Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials took into custody Syed Ahmed Jamal, a husband, father of three, chemistry professor and community leader, on January 24, 2018. Mr. Jamal is detained at a Morgan County, Mo. jail while awaiting an immigration judge’s decision on granting a stay of removal. The motions for a stay of removal and to rescind a final deportation order were filed with the court and served on Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys on February 5, 2018. They remain pending.

Mr. Jamal has deep ties to the United States having come to America from Bangladesh over 30 years ago on a student visa. He was granted an H-1B visa for highly skilled workers and then transitioned to another student visa when he enrolled in a doctoral program. Despite his efforts to secure permanent status in the US, he found himself in removal proceedings. He was advised by an attorney that he was only eligible to leave the country voluntarily, despite his fear of returning to Bangladesh. His failure to depart caused the triggering of an automatic deportation order. Mr. Jamal obtained his work permit after DHS placed him on an Order of Supervision (OSUP). OSUPs are given to individuals so that they may remain out of custody despite the existence of a deportation order. They allow individuals to obtain employment authorization from DHS.

At the time of Mr. Jamal’s arrest in January, he was an adjunct chemistry professor at Park University in Kansas City and was conducting research at area hospitals. Without a stay of removal, Mr. Jamal remains at risk of being deported from the U.S. as soon as early next week and before the Immigration Court can review the matter. In accordance with the February 20, 2017, Kelly Memorandum, Enforcement of the Immigration Laws to Serve the National Interest, it is unlikely that ICE officials will exercise prosecutorial discretion in releasing Mr. Jamal from jail or allowing him to remain in the country.

“Only an immigration judge has the authority to cure the defective proceedings. At the very least, Mr. Jamal is entitled to a proper hearing resulting in a proper order,” states Rekha Sharma-Crawford, Mr. Jamal’s attorney. “This is about the rule of law and the integrity of a system. If we allow flawed orders, which would never be tolerated in any other legal proceeding or in society in general, to be the basis of removing a beloved father, husband and community member, it is a bigger threat to the system than this one case. To tear apart a family and drag them out of a country after having such meaningful ties, is a tragedy, plain and simple.”

“The law requires that certain formalities be met in order to grant voluntary departure. This responsibility is placed, by the rule of law, on the judge and not anyone else. Where a judge fails to carry out this important duty, the order is invalid. This is true in every area of law. For example, parties can agree to get divorced, but a judge must still follow the law and enter a valid order, which can satisfy the legal requirements. The same is true for Mr. Jamal. Deporting a person when the order is not legally sound is a threat to the system. That is not what the American legal system stands for,” says Sharma-Crawford. “DHS could recognize the legal issues at play and agree to either stay his removal pending completion of his legal proceedings, or they could agree that the order is flawed, and let the case proceed as a matter of course. What they will do remains to be seen. In the meantime, a family remains divided and his wife and children struggle every day without him.”

Contrary to what ICE had indicated, Mr. Jamal was not charged with or convicted of any crimes, misdemeanor or otherwise. Sharma-Crawford says, “This is another American story turned into a nightmare by the current divisive climate regarding immigration. It sends a false message that immigrants are criminals and detrimental to America.” ICE statements also have indicated that Mr. Jamal appealed his case. The Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) reviewed his case based on their “certification” authority, and as such, to call it an appeal is a mischaracterization of what occurred.

Several members of Congress show a willingness to maintain a sense of humanity in the immigration debate. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (MO), Rep. Kevin Yoder (KS), and Rep. Ro Khanna (CA) voice their concerns about the methods ICE used in this instance. “Children should never have to watch immigration officials forcibly take a parent from their home. The damage the Agency is doing to the next generation is profound,” Sharma-Crawford states.

Civil Rights Activist and Lawyer, Valarie Kaur, to Make Special Appearance at One Community: Together in Solidarity

Kaur to appear at a collaboration of communities, leadership and faith aimed at overcoming the hate, violence and division pervasive in our neighborhoods.

Kansas City, MO (April 19, 2017) – Valarie Kaur, civil rights activist and lawyer, makes a special appearance at the One Community: Together in Solidarity event on Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at the Rolling Hills Presbyterian Church located at 9300 Nall Avenue in Overland Park, Kansas. This event, in collaboration with various communities, leadership and faiths, is being spearheaded by a local attorney who felt compelled to act in the face of the Olathe shooting tragedy.

“After the shooting, I felt like the community needed to find a way back to center. There needed to be a way to unify communities across the metro so that everyone felt safer. The current climate in the U.S. has caused many communities to be fearful and feel vulnerable,” explains Rekha Sharma-Crawford a principal in Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law. “However, information alone isn’t enough to translate into action. Events like One Community: Together in Solidarity are important to help draw communities together with faith leaders, government leaders and law enforcement in support of one another, which can help overcome the feelings of isolation and create stronger bonds between communities; something that only makes us all safer.”

One of the highlights of the event is a special appearance by the inspirational Valarie Kaur, who will be speaking at length, and closing the program with a question and answer session. Kaur is a well-known civil rights activist, lawyer, award-winning filmmaker, media commentator, educator, entrepreneur, author and Sikh American justice leader. Her new venture, the Revolutionary Love Project at the University of Southern California, champions the ethic of love in an era of rage. She can be followed on Twitter under @valariekaur.

“Fashioned after the “Not In Our Town” model, One Community: Together in Solidarity is a program that brings together so many amazing organizations like the American Friends Service Committee, Kansas City Coalition Against Hate Violence, Immigrant Justice Advocacy Movement, and SevenDays to name just a few. It also brings leadership from governmental agencies in Overland Park, Merriam, Leawood, and even the Consulate of Mexico in Kansas City. Representatives from many faiths will also be present to stand together in unity. Everyone has been so generous with their time, space and knowledge in helping make this happen. We hope to help heal the KC metro after this tragedy and show the world of the resilience and community that exists in the middle of the United States. It is hoped that neighbors and other local residents will attend events like One Community: Together in Solidarity and join a movement to stand together against the hate and violence that divides us,” says Sharma-Crawford. As a way to visually show solidarity, ribbons will be handed out at the event and people will be encouraged to display these ribbons across the metro as a sign of solidarity.

The doors open for One Community: Together in Solidarity at 6:00 p.m. and the program begins promptly at 6:30 p.m., lasting until 9:00 p.m. The event is free, but registration is requested.

Trump Administration Displays Disregard for Families and American Due Process with Abrupt Late Night Deportation of Indiana Father


Wednesday, April 5, 2017

The Beristain Family is distraught this morning as the U.S. government conducted a middle-of-the-night deportation of Roberto Beristain, an Indiana father and businessman whose detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in February during a check-in appointment attracted broad attention by the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, South Bend Tribune, and other national news media.

Roberto had been held at detention facilities in Indiana, Wisconsin, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Texas. He argued that his removal order was legally improper, and had asked an immigration judge to rescind the removal order, and to stay removal. He had also filed a habeas corpus petition, likewise seeking to redress the wrongs resulting from a void order. Before either judge had chance to rule, in a highly unusual move, ICE agents rushed him 90 miles from the detention facility to the U.S.-Mexico border at Juarez, Mexico, as the sole detainee being moved. None of his attorneys were notified, as required, of his removal and they only learned about it based on a late night, frantic call from Roberto’s wife, who indicated Roberto was in Juarez already.

“They suddenly told me it was time to go,” Roberto said. “They told me to get my stuff, they put me in the back of a van, and sped toward the border. They took me to another facility while in transport to sign paperwork. I asked to speak with my attorney, but was told there wasn’t time for that. At around 10:00 pm, I was dropped off at the Mexico-U.S. Border and walked into Mexico.”

“What is most distressing here is that Roberto had potential avenues for relief pending before the Immigration Court,” said Adam M. Ansari, managing partner, Ansari & Shapiro LLC, who
has been advocating on behalf of the family since Roberto was detained on February 6, 2017. “This was an attempt to short-circuit the justice process by intentionally removing him before a judge could stop his removal. We were in communication with the government regarding those motions – what they failed to mention was that they were in the process of throwing him out of the country.”

Jessica K. Miles of Noble & Vrapi, Roberto’s counsel in New Mexico and Texas remarked, “the manner and speed with which Roberto was moved from New Mexico to Texas and then deported to Mexico despite several pending motions, coupled with misleading statements from ICE leadership about when he would be removed show a blatant disregard for his procedural rights.”

Chuck Roth, director of litigation of the National Immigrant Justice Center said, “the Trump administration treats noncitizens like Roberto like lawbreakers, even when they do everything in their power to obey the law, but the law was broken in this case by the immigration authorities. ICE’s actions have torn a father from his three U.S. citizen children, a husband from his citizen spouse, and a business owner from his American employees. And all based on a removal order which wasn’t proper in the first place. I’m not sure which is more shocking, the disregard for the harm done wantonly to families and communities, or the lengths to which the government is now willing to go to deport as many people as possible without regard to a person’s right to a fair hearing.”

“The conduct of ICE in perpetuating a continuing due process violation at all costs, is a threat to core American values and should not be overlooked or brushed aside causally,” said Rekha Sharma-Crawford, of Sharma-Crawford, who drafted the Emergency Motion to Rescind that is pending in Batavia, New York.

Attorneys for Beristain, which include multiple law firms and organizations across the country, have stated they will continue to fight on behalf of Roberto, and will pursue all available legal and political remedies to bring Roberto back and correct the mistake immigration officials created nearly two decades ago.

Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law Announces New Focus on National Interest Waivers (NIW)

In addition to its other practice areas, Kansas City-based firm also will concentrate on clients who contribute to the national interest and may be eligible for permanent residence in the EB-2 immigrant visa preference category. 

Kansas City, MO (September 21, 2016)  Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law announces they have added a new focus to their immigration law practice. In addition to other areas, the firm also will concentrate on clients who may fall under the EB-2 immigrant visa preference category for U.S. employment-based permanent residency. The firm is well recognized for litigating complicated immigration cases, and often takes cases in which clients’ have unique situations and life stories. Given the heightened standards faced by those seeking residency through the National Interest Waiver process, the firm’s expertise in litigating complex cases places them in an unrivaled position to handle these cases.

“As trial lawyers, we’re different. We believe legal cases are about understanding people’s stories. We believe that decision makers need to understand the caliber of our clients, what they do to benefit the greater good, and how the law supports their cases,” explains Rekha Sharma-Crawford a principal in Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law, LLC.

The EB-2 immigrant visa preference category includes “members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and individuals who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural or educational interests, or welfare of the United States, and whose services in the sciences, arts, professions, or business are sought by an employer in the United States,” as created by congress with the Immigration Act of 1990. EB-2 categories usually require the Labor Certification application followed by the employer-filed I-140.

The NIW petition, however, waives EB-2’s Labor Certification requirement, but a person must fulfill three requirements that demonstrate permanent residency is in the nation’s best interest: work in the U.S. has “substantial intrinsic merit,” is “national in scope,” and “waiving the labor certification requirement would benefit the national interests of the United States.” The term “national interest” does not have a statutory or regulatory definition, which is where it becomes essential to be able to help explain, in plain language, what it is that the person does and its wider impact.

There are many ways that an individual’s contributions can further a national interest. For example, does the work that the individual performs help the American economy? Does it improve health care? Are they on the verge of a cutting edge discovery that has the potential to change or even create an industry? Other possibilities may include things like:

  • Will it create affordable housing for the poor, elderly and children?
  • Will the environment and natural resources usage improve?
  • Will it unlock a medical mystery and help change the way medical matters are approached or handled in a particular field?

“When we began to think about expanding our services, we realized that we had a passion for innovation. We use it in the way we litigate and we understand the way creative thought can lead to profound change. Thus, visa cases for members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and individuals with exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business and whose services in the sciences, arts, professions, or business are sought by an employer in the U.S. became our new passion. These cases appeal to our curiosity and unwavering need to understand and tell their stories in a way only trial lawyers can,” states Sharma-Crawford.

About Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law

Sharma-Crawford, Attorneys at Law is a nationally recognized firm specializing in the complexities of immigration litigation. Practice specialties include criminal or civil litigation in state, federal or immigration court. The attorneys of Sharma-Crawford also speak and educate peers and the community on issues pertaining to the complexities of immigration and immigration litigation. The firm is located on the border of Kansas City’s Westside and the Crossroads Arts District.


National Immigration Law Center Sues to Force Kansas to Disclose Information about Discriminatory Treatment of Refugees

KANSAS City, MO. & LOS ANGELES, CA., (April 5, 2016) – Kansas may not keep its unlawful discrimination against Syrian refugees a secret, according to a lawsuit filed by the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) and co-counsel Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law, LLC, under the Kansas Open Records Act. The suit, filed after more than two months of requests and appeals, seeks to learn more about how officials are implementing Gov. Sam Brownback’s unconstitutional instruction to state agencies not to assist in the resettlement of certain individuals designated by the federal government as refugees.

Last November, Brownback issued an executive order instructing state officials to engage in discriminatory practices to make it difficult for Syrian refugees to begin new lives in Kansas. He has since issued a more ambiguous order that could have the same pernicious effect.

“Syrian refugees have fled unspeakable violence, undergone years of background checks and want nothing more than to begin their lives anew in America,” said Melissa Keaney, attorney for the NILC. “Through his order, Gov. Brownback may be pushing his state agencies to make their new lives in America even more difficult, if not impossible—and he has done so in secret. We filed this lawsuit today because the public has a right to know if the state is engaging in discriminatory, unconstitutional behavior.”

“Gov. Brownback’s latest executive order leaves out way more than it includes,” said Justin Cox, cooperating attorney with the NILC. “Nowhere does it explain the circumstances under which the state would conclude that a particular refugee is a security risk, who within the state would make that determination or if it has already been made. For all that’s known publicly, Kansas could be barring refugees from the state solely because of their religion or country of birth.”

More than ten weeks ago, NILC requested information under the Kansas Open Records Act from the governor’s office and two agencies involved in administering federally funded benefits to refugees: the Kansas Department for Women and Children and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Under the law, state officials have three business days to act on a request for public records.

“This lawsuit demonstrates what is all too common: public officials routinely violate the Kansas Open Records Act, making a mockery of the law’s promise of governmental transparency,” said Rekha Sharma-Crawford, who is serving as co-counsel on the case. “Usually the public officials get away with ignoring the law, but not this time.”

NILC and Sharma-Crawford Attorneys hope that the lawsuit will compel the state to provide more information about how it is implementing the executive order in order to shine a public light on the state’s potentially unconstitutional, discriminatory actions.

The petition for declaratory and injunctive relief is available at

About Sharma-Crawford Attorneys At Law
Sharma-Crawford, Attorneys at Law specializes in the complexities of immigration litigation. Practice specialties include criminal or civil litigation in state, federal or immigration court. The attorneys of Sharma-Crawford also speak and educate peers and the community on issues pertaining to the complexities of immigration and immigration litigation. The firm is located on the border of Kansas City’s Westside and the Crossroads Arts District.